May 30, 2024

Maryland Heights Residents

Crazy About Home & Real Estate

LA Jury Hits Real Estate Agent With $500K Punitive Verdict Over Concealed Fire Damage

3 min read
LA Jury Hits Real Estate Agent With $500K Punitive Verdict Over Concealed Fire Damage

Sandoval closings

CVN screenshot of plaintiff attorney Abraham Sandoval exhibiting a photograph of hearth damage in his client’s property throughout his closing argument 

Compton, CA – A California condition court docket jury has returned a $500,000 punitive damages verdict from a real estate agent accused of concealing a home’s in depth hearth hurt from the eventual buyer.

The Los Angeles County jury found in favor of plaintiff Jose Jimenez in a trial that commenced on July 21. Jimenez sued his authentic estate agent Louis Teque and Capero Investments Inc. in 2018 immediately after acquiring a residence he claimed he could not are living in due to serious fireplace injury brought on by defective wiring.

Jimenez accused Teque of failing to give needed disclosures about the home’s situation in formal documentation just before closing on the sale, but the protection managed Jimenez understood about the home’s ailment and declined to undertake voluntary inspections that could have revealed the injury.

The verdict also consists of $106,852 in compensatory damages mainly connected to Jimenez’ ongoing payments on the unoccupied household and his earlier and ongoing payments for rental housing.

The complete demo was webcast gavel-to-gavel by Courtroom Look at Community, which maintains the world’s only on the web online video library of civil trial proceedings.


After the demo attorney Abraham Sandoval of Sandoval Regulation, who represented Jimenez, advised CVN the verdict considerably outpaces their first settlement need of $100,000, which would have included the economic damages awarded.

“The Defendants refused to make any legit give either before or all through the demo,” Sandoval mentioned. “Therefore, it was our placement we ended up likely to go to verdict no subject what.”

An legal professional for the defendants did not quickly react to a request for remark.

Sandoval stated the documentation furnished to Jimenez naturally omitting any reference to the home’s sizeable hearth problems played a crucial job in persuading the jury to award punitive damages.

“I concentrated on that seriously and also on the many admissions by the agent and brokerage in the course of demo that they experienced prior knowledge of flaws with the residence,” Sandoval said. “Instead of disclosing them as is their inarguable duty, they hid them and drafted bogus disclosures to mislead their very own customer so that they could shut the transaction and receive commissions.”

Sandoval characterized punitive damages awards in Compton as “very number of and considerably between” and explained he felt the jury reacted strongly to the notion of a neighborhood pushing again on predatory behavior by true estate agents.

“I requested the jury to ship a robust concept that this type of habits is not acceptable in our group,” Sandoval claimed. “We can not permit qualified genuine estate agents to falsify disclosures and usually mislead their have clientele to their determent, and then seem the other way.”

Supplying his guidance to newer trial attorneys, Sandoval highlighted his choice not to have interaction in unneeded confrontation with defense witnesses but to in its place concentration on redirecting them to present the evidence Sandoval preferred to get in entrance of the jury.

“Ultimately, all of these Protection witnesses, through their testimony, assisted Plaintiff,” Sandoval reported.

Sandoval had sort words and phrases for his opposing counsel in the father-and-son protection crew of Alex and Maximilano Galindo of Curd Galindo & Smith LLP, describing them as “excellent legal professionals.”

“But in this case, as I told the jury for the duration of closing, there was a mountain of evidence, and in the end none of it was refuted,” he reported.

The trial took put before Choose Michael Shultz.

The situation is captioned Jose Ivan Rodriguez Jimenez v. Capero Invetments Inc. & Louis Brian Teque, case selection 18CMCV00035, in Los Angeles County Remarkable Court.

E-mail David Siegel at [email protected]

Copyright © All rights reserved. | Newsphere by AF themes.