Real estate agent Manpreet Dandiwal and his two nephews charged over Bulleen park brawl

Mr Dandiwal stated he would combat the fees.

“I vigorously deny all of the allegations towards me and will vigorously protect people fees,” he told The Age.

“My prior workforce initiated the altercation versus myself and the other two gentleman [sic] who are my nephews, as very well the other people today that ended up there that day.

“I am bitterly let down and shocked that myself and my nephews ended up the only ones charged. My attorneys are currently seeking into the matter with the Victoria Police as all we did was defend ourselves as I was assaulted very first.

“For the file they are disgruntled former workforce and I am the afflicted party in this subject as they have tried out to intimidate and threaten me as they owe me money.”

Mr Virk, a transaction adviser at PSP Property, and Mr Chahal, a sales govt at the business, did not react to a ask for for remark.

PSP Assets was started off by Mr Dandiwal in 2018.

On its web-site, PSP Residence is described as “Victoria’s leading entire-provider assets agency” boasting the successful negotiation of more than $3 billion in profits. In 2019, The Australian Financial Assessment noted that Mr Dandiwal could be 1 of the “biggest beneficiaries of Melbourne’s the latest boom in land charges”.

Last year, Mr Dandiwal was engaged in a authorized fight against a number of previous workforce, which include a person who established up a rival actual estate company on Melbourne’s western fringe.

Supreme Court of Victoria records demonstrate Mr Dandiwal in May well, 2020 sought to consider out an injunction versus his former staff members to protect against them from applying the speak to particulars of prospective purchasers he claimed were being attained through their work with him.

He swore their use of the contacts could cause his business “irreparable harm”.

Mr Dandiwal claimed in an affidavit that the former workers experienced forwarded shopper particulars to external e-mail addresses or, in one scenario, downloaded his get hold of databases. He claimed this was a breach of confidentiality agreements they experienced signed when accepting work with him.

Whilst accepting Mr Dandiwal had obtained confidentiality undertakings from the previous personnel, associate judge Mary-Jane Ierodiaconou refused his software for an injunction.

“Contact facts is not private in the age of the world-wide-web. The plaintiff mistakenly regards it [Mr Dandiwal’s company] has a proprietary desire in the get hold of information collected. No injunction should really be permitted to restraining mere knowledge or know-how,” she identified.

“There is no evidence in any way of any misuse of confidential information and facts. There is proof that the defendants have in their possession portion of a databases that they manufactured for the goal of getting in touch with clients, but there is no proof of any breach of their private information obligations.

“The data was despatched by the defendants to themselves when in the employ of the plaintiff for the objective of performing their operate. Individuals e-mails had been sent numerous months, and in some situations a lot more than a yr, just before the termination of employment … there is no evidence that at the time people e-mails were being sent there was any intent to use the e-mail for any function not permitted below their work contracts.”

It is not recognised if any of the former employees concerned in the lawful dispute ended up existing at the Bulleen combat in September.

Intriguing solutions to perplexing inquiries shipped to your inbox just about every 7 days. Sign up to get our new Explainer newsletter below.